
Does J.K. Rowling have a right to protest thievery of her H. Potter material? Yes. Will she win? Sadly, no.
Rowling's in court this week testifying against a proposed H. Potter encyclopedia published by Lexicon. Word is she was planning her own encyclopedia (with proceeds donated to charity, no less) when Lexicon beat her to the punch and produced their own version. Yes, she's the richest woman writer in the world; but I say to you- she still has a right to own her own ideas.
You may say Rowling has enough success to share, and there's certainly enough fan-base willing to shell out for every bit of merchandising even vaguely related to her hit series, but I stand in defense of Rowling's intellectual rights. The woman produced an iconic story, a story that made both children and adults excited to read, excited to purchase books and cherish them, and excited to look for others to fill the gap now that they've concluded. It seems there are plenty salivating to take advantage of that excitement. Though copyright laws allow for nearly anyone to publish a companion series to her story without violating her rights, I wish we'd let her exhaust her efforts before encroaching on them. Can there be too many books on one subject? Quality over quantity, I say. Putting out nine hundred different companion books while the real author is still alive and writing: Riddikulus!
Find out more:
Rowling Testifies Against Lexicon Author.